TABLE OF CONTENTS
DUI and .08 BAC: It's In The
Blood
MTI Can Help With Your DUI Case
New Reference Manual On Scientific Evidence DUI
and .08 BAC: IT'S IN THE BLOOD? In 1999 the Department of
Transportation submitted a report to the GAO entitled "Highway Safety
Effectiveness of State .08 Blood Alcohol Laws" in which the department
detailed the expense of Driving Under the Influence (DUI) on the nation's
economy. The report was instrumental in the federal government mandating
in this year's Federal Transportation Appropriations Bill that all states be
made to comply with the .08 Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC). Under the
provisions of Public Law 106-346--passed by both houses of Congress on October 6
and signed into law by the President on October 23--states will be required to
enforce a national standard of .08 or risk losing highway funds over the next
several years. An accompanying report by
the House Appropriations Committee noted that safety--not concrete--should be
government's primary concern with transportation issues. Everyone is in
agreement that reducing the number of DUI related accidents and fatalities is
indeed a laudable goal. However, there is also the recognition that
setting a "safe" number for the BAC will always be arbitrary, since
alcohol sensitivity can vary from time to time, person to person, and situation
to situation. Clear-cut empirical evidence exists in the scientific
literature that no single limit can be determined from where alcohol impairment
begins. It is also recognized that there are many other contributing
factors that lead to unsafe driving and many of these factors enhance or mimic
the effects of alcohol. Fatigue, prescription drug use, and metabolism
problems such as diabetes or other endocrine disorders are just a few of the
many variables that can influence or have a similar effect independent of and in
conjunction with alcohol. Analysis of Body
Fluids --Various devices
and types of BAC testing methods have been developed to help identify and remove
drinking drivers from the highway. The BAC describes the concentration
of alcohol in a person's blood expressed as weight per unit of volume.
For example, at 0.10 % BAC there is a concentration of 100 mg of alcohol per
100 ml blood. A blood test is not necessary to determine a persons BAC;
however, of the available methods it is often considered the most reliable and
has the advantage of being saved for future reference. Although the BAC
can also be measured by analyzing exhaled breath, urinalysis or saliva, numerous
studies have shown that none of the available methods or testing devices
are 100% reliable. Visual Detection
Guidelines --Law enforcement officers are trained to detect visual cues
that may seem to indicate alcohol impairment such as driving too slow, a sudden
stop or swerve, a slow or no response to a direct question. The National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration since 1975 has been sponsoring research
that has led to development of standardized methods of evaluation. Currently,
the most commonly used is the Standardized Field Sobriety Test (SFST) which
consists of a battery of three tests including: Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (involuntary
jerking of one's eye); Walk and Turn Test; and the One Leg Stand. NHTSA
research indicates that this method when administered properly allows proper
classification of approximately 77% of suspects. However, the test can
also indicate consumption of seizure medications, phencyclidine, and a variety
of inhalants, barbiturates and other depressants, disease, or a variety of physical
disorders. Since neither analysis
of body fluids nor visual detection guidelines are deemed 100% accurate, nor
do they allow for individual variation, in this article we will examine the
acute physiological effects of alcohol and related factors that can enhance
or mimic the effects of alcohol. We will also look at some of the ways
toxicologists attempt to compute or refute the BAC from available evidence,
including the alcohol content of a given beverage. Ethyl alcohol or
ethanol, commonly known as "alcohol," is the active ingredient
in most beer, wine and spirits. Beers and wines are the direct products
of the fermentation of grains and fruits. Spirits (whiskey, rum etc.)
are produced by distillation of fermented mash, a mixture of grains, water,
sugar and yeast. Regardless of which product is consumed, the primary
intoxicating ingredient is alcohol. There is also wide
variation in the alcohol content of any of the three products and even more
variation within the various groups. Toxicologists should exercise caution
when performing calculations to select the most appropriate estimate for alcoholic
strength of any beverage. Studies show that in any alcoholic beverage,
particularly beers, there can be significant disparity between the concentration
listed on the label (if any) and the actual measured alcohol concentration.
The following table provides a general overview: The physiological
effect that drinking alcohol will have on a person depends on how much alcohol
builds up in the bloodstream. The BAC is not a constant but one that rises
and falls depending on the amount of alcohol consumed and how fast it is absorbed
from the gastrointestinal tract, how it is distributed to the body and how quickly
it is eliminated from the body. Alcohol is absorbed
along the entire length of the GI tract, but primarily in the first section
of the small intestine. Food or even the amount of mixer in a drink can
slow or retard absorption into the small intestine. A large meal or heavy
snacking can slow absorption to the point that the peak is not reached
for 6 hours or more and can also lower the BAC. Almost as soon as alcohol
enters the bloodstream the body starts eliminating it. One to three
percent is given off unchanged in the urine, perspiration and expired air.
The remainder of the alcohol is oxidized or burned up by various organs, but
mostly by the liver. About 75% of the oxidation of alcohol takes place
in the liver. The chemical breakdown of alcohol in the body (metabolism)
is accomplished by several enzymes through a series of processes that rapidly
convert the chemicals into substances usable by the body such as amino acids,
carbohydrates and fats. Weight, gender, age, time of day, drugs, health
of the liver, food, menstrual cycle, disease and a multitude of other factors
serve to moderate the rate at which the metabolism of alcohol occurs in the
individual. Once you allow for individual variation the rate at which
alcohol is metabolized is relatively constant. BAC charts that use
the amount of alcohol consumed, weight of the individual and time factors can
be helpful in that they give a snapshot average. However, no facile computation
can account for the multitude of variables that need to go into making an accurate
assessment for the court. The following is an example of a simplistic
table for charting the BAC based on 12 oz. beer at 5%, 5 oz. wine at 12% or
1½ oz. whiskey at 40% (80 proof) all equaling approximately 6 oz. alcohol:
After
1 Drink
2 Drinks
3 Drinks
4 Drinks
Hours
4 3
2 1
4 3
2 1
4 3
2 1
4 3
2 1
- - -
.02
- - .04
.06
- - -
.02
- - .03
.04
- - -
.01
- -
.02 .04
- - -
.01 -
- .02 .03
- - -
.01
- - .01
.03 -
- .01 .02 As alcohol enters the
bloodstream it travels throughout the body easily diffusing alcohol into cells
through the cell membranes. Organs with dense networks of blood
vessels such as the brain, kidneys, liver and lungs rapidly attain the same
alcohol level as the blood. These organs get a higher initial concentration
of alcohol than the other organs. However, since the body is largely water
eventually even distribution takes place through the water in all of the
tissues of the body and it is at this point equilibration is reached and the
BAC is at its maximum. Distribution in
the body, like absorption and elimination, is a key component of the equation
for computing the BAC. Great variation exists between the water content
of tissues. For instance, adipose (fatty) tissue contains less water than
muscle tissue and most women have more adipose tissue than men. In most
instances, all else being equal, a women will become intoxicated more quickly
because more alcohol will remain concentrated in the fluids of a woman's body
and not disperse more evenly through the more watery muscle tissue. Women
also tend to be smaller than men and weight also effects distribution; therefore,
the same amount of alcohol can produce a dramatically different BAC. The Endocrine System
(glands) also plays a role by producing and secreting hormones.
Alcohol can alter the basic functioning of glands, like the pancreas that secretes
insulin to regulate the amount of sugar in the blood. The pancreas tends
to overreact in the presence of alcohol and the result can be temporary hypoglycemia
(low blood sugar). And in the case of diabetics who are already taking
insulin a small amount of alcohol could trigger a reaction mimicking a
much higher level of intoxication. Another gland that plays a key role
is the pituitary which regulates how much water is retained by the kidneys.
Alcohol can inhibit the release of the antidiuretic hormone from the pituitary
which leads to increased urination. However, this phenomenon mainly
takes place while the BAC is rising and generally urination falls to below normal
in the later stages. Various guidelines
have been produced to assess the state of intoxication of an individual
drinker; however, there is no observable effect that can define the moment
of .08 or even come close due to individual variation and level of tolerance.
However there are certain actions on the nervous system that are somewhat predictable
as the BAC rises. In the subclinical stage there is usually no loss
of coordination or any outward signs of impairment. As the BAC rises inhibitions
lower and a general euphoria or feeling of well being will follow. In
most individuals by the time the BAC reaches 0.08 there can be a slight impairment
of balance, speech, vision, reaction time and hearing. At
0.10 it is illegal to operate a vehicle in any state in the U.S. based on studies
that show in most cases there can be significant impairment of motor coordination
and loss of good judgment. Individuals can also
build up a tolerance to alcohol ingestion that can make assessment by
visual observation difficult if not impossible. Studies show that in heavy
drinkers changes take place in the actual physiology of the body and in their
behavioral adaptation which can allow them to compensate. An extreme example
is on record in Sweden of a man actually driving with a BAC of .54 w/v, the
point at which most humans would be comatose if not dead. Although, this
example is certainly not the norm; distribution, absorption and elimination
are all affected in heavy drinkers and must be taken into consideration when
making observations or computational assessments. According to several
recent studies fatigue can also mimic or alter the physiology of how
alcohol is used by the body. Dr. Herbert Moskowitz in his April 2000 review
of the literature for the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
believes more research needs to be done on the interaction of alcohol with sleep
deprivation and circadian rhythms, noting "there is strong evidence produced
by the studies on drowsiness that the ability to remain alert and functioning
is impaired by alcohol." Meanwhile, a 1999 study by Lamond &
Dawson quantified the performance impairment associated with fatigue by systematically
comparing the effects of fatigue and alcohol intoxication. The researchers
concluded that "moderate levels of fatigue produce performance equivalent
to or greater than those observed at levels of alcohol intoxication deemed unacceptable
when driving, working and/or operating dangerous equipment." Another often overlooked
factor in driver impairment that can mimic or enhance the effects of alcohol
is prescription and over the counter drug use, including many
of the herbal preparations. It is generally recognized that illegal
drugs impair driving skills; however, common everyday drugs can impair driving
skills by causing drowsiness or putting the individual in a hyperactive or highly
sedated inattentive state. The mechanism of action of each medication
varies almost as much as individual reaction to the drug or combination of drugs.
This physiological variation is only magnified when combined with alcohol.
In general: Central Nervous
System Depressants such as barbiturates, tranquilizers and other drugs that
slow brain function can produce slowed reflexes, inability to divide attention,
reduced inhibitions, lack of concentration, impaired vision and coordination,
and slurred speech. Central Nervous
System Stimulants such as ephedrine, amphetamines, caffeine, appetite suppressants,
and various herbal preparations can also cause impairment. Symptoms can
include nervousness, irritability, inability to think or concentrate and unpredictable
or bizarre behavior. Narcotic Analgesics
including opium derivatives such as morphine and other synthetic pain relievers
produce symptoms similar to many of the central nervous system depressants,
but more extreme. The discussion above
demonstrates how easily factors that mimic the effects of alcohol can lead to
false or misleading conclusions. Additionally, specific effects of alcohol
consumption on an individual's cognitive and motor skills can vary dramatically
after consuming alcohol alone or in combination with prescription or over-the-counter
drugs. These differences, ranging from those arising from weight
and hormone variations, fatigue, unique experiential and behavioral characteristics,
and interaction with other drugs, suggest that at best we presently have very
limited knowledge on the differing effects which alcohol has on an individual.
Each individual DUI case is indeed unique and the inherent variations of each
case must be taken into consideration when attempting to calculate or assess
blood alcohol concentration.
Most BEERS --Contain 4-5% alcohol but can go to 17%
Most WINES --Contain 10-20% alcohol
Most SPIRITS --Contain 40% (80 proof) to 50% (100 proof)
Weight (lbs.)
100
.05
.07 .08 .09
.09
.10 .12 .13
120
.03
.04 .06 .08
.06
.08 .09 .11
140
.02
.03 .05 .06
.04
.06 .08 .09
160
.01
.02 .04 .05
.03
.04 .06 .08
180
- .02 .03 .04
.02 .04 .05 .07
200
-
- - -
- .01 .03 .04
.01 .03 .04 .06
Fillmore, M.T.; M. Vogel-Sprott. Behavioral Impairment Under Alcohol: Cognitive and Pharmacokinetic Factors. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 22(7): 1476-82, 1998.
Holloway, F.A. Low Dose Alcohol Effects on Human Behavior and Performance: A Review of Post -1984 Research. GRA&I, Issue 05, 1995.
Jones, A.W. The Drunkest Drinking Driver in Sweden: Blood Alcohol Concentration of 0.545% w/v. J Stud Alcohol 60(3):400-6, 1999.
Lamond, N.; D. Dawson. Quantifying the Performance Impairment Associated With Fatigue. Journal of Sleep Research. 8(4): 255-262, 1999.
Logan, B. K.; G.A. Case; S. Distefano. Alcohol Content of Beer And Malt Beverages: Forensic Considerations. J Forensic Sci 44(6): 1292-5, 1999.
Lucey, M.R.; et.al. The Influences of Age and Gender on Blood Ethanol Concentrations in Healthy Humans. J Stud Alcohol 60(1): 103-110, 1999.
Martin, C.S.; H.B. Moss. Measurement of Acute Tolerance to Alcohol in Human Subjects. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 17(2): 211-6, 1993.
Mcknight, A.J. et.al. Estimating Blood Alcohol Level From Observable Signs. Accident Analysis & Prevention 29(2): 247-255, 1997.
Moskowitz, Herbert; Dary Fiorintino. A Review of the Literature on the Effects of Low Doses of Alcohol on Driving Related Skills. US Department of Transportation, NHTSA, April 2000.
National Institute On Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Physiological Effects of Alcohol. Alcohol Topics RPO 382, 1982.
Pufal, E. et.al. Pharmaceuticals and Drugs in Road Traffic: Developments in Poland and Current Situation in Bydgoszcz. Blutalkohol 36(5): 284-289, 1999.
US, GAO. Highway Safety Effectiveness of State .08 Blood Alcohol Laws. General Accounting Office Washington, DC: 1999.
| MTI CAN HELP WITH YOUR DUI CASE At MTI we are committed to providing our clients with the most accurate research information available to ensure that the court's requirements for sound science are met in each and every case. 1. MTI can provide an authoritative assessment of your case for merit by experienced medical professionals. 2. MTI can provide thorough coverage of all of the available literature including the hard to find material that is not indexed or in the grey literature. Our solid research findings in numerous cases have given clients the winning edge in the courtroom. 3. MTI can provide expert opinion and testimony from highly qualified, experienced professionals. Our MD and PhD consultants that work with us are practicing physicians, toxicologists, pharmacologists and researchers in their respective fields that are committed to the principles of sound science. FOR CONSULTATION CALL 703 MTI-INFO (703) 684-4636 TODAY FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION E-MAIL mti@medtoxinfo.com |
The Federal Judicial Center in Washington, D.C. has published the revised, second edition of its Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence. The Manual, as Fern Smith, Director of the Center, notes in the preface to this new edition, assists "federal judges in recognizing the characteristics and reasoning of ‘science’ as it is relevant in litigation." This is not merely a re-printing of the 1994 Manual; several new chapters have been added. In a concise and very readable Introduction, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer reviews the increasingly important role scientific evidence plays in litigation and the corresponding challenges trial courts must meet if science is to "find a warm welcome . . . in our courtrooms." The first edition of the Manual was published in 1994 largely as a result of the landmark 1993 Supreme Court case on expert testimony, Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals; in a new chapter by Margaret Berger, law professor at the Brooklyn Law School, "The Supreme Court’s Trilogy on the Admissibility of Expert Testimony," she helpfully summarizes Daubert as well as two subsequent cases, 1997's General Electric Co. v Joiner and 1999's Kumho Tire Co. v Carmichael. A likewise welcome addition to this revised Manual is "How Science Works" by David Goodstein, a professor of physics at the California Institute of Technology, who discusses the philosophy and practice of Science. New reference guides on medical testimony and engineering are also included, which should assist judges in their review for cases involving nonscientific expert testimony. One of the more requested portions of the first edition--the Reference Guides--remain but have been updated with new cases and additional material. The Reference Guide on DNA Evidence, however, has been completely revised to take account of the rapid changes that the last six years have seen in this field. To make room for these changes and additions, some of the material in the first edition on court-appointed experts has been condensed and rearranged into a new chapter, "Management of Expert Evidence," written by William W. Schwarzer, U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of California, and Joe Cecil, director of the Judicial Center’s Scientific Evidence Project.
The Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence is a welcome resource for a firm grounding in the complexities of science in the courtroom. An electronic version of the Manual may be downloaded off the Internet by pointing your browser to:
http://air.fjc.gov/public/fjcweb.nsf/pages/16
MTI REVIEW is a publication of Medical & Toxicological Information, A Division of NICOM, Inc. providing scientific information to non-scientific communities. Entire contents copyright by MTI. No other publication or reproduction rights granted without the express written permission of the publisher.
© 2000 MEDICAL & TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION, A Division of NICOM, Inc.
Copyright
©1996- 2005 Medical & Toxicological Information (MTI) A Division
of NICOM, Inc. All rights reserved
703 684-4636 703 MTI-INFO
Home
About MTI
Contact MTI
News/Pub
Services