
Pesticides and the Food Quality Protection Act of
1996
Most Americans enjoy
coming home to an almost pest free environment, shopping in clean grocery stores
lined with shelves of sanitized products and bins full of produce devoid of worm
holes or crawling insects. Rats do not run amuck in droves spreading disease and
millions dying of bubonic plague is resigned to the history books. For this we
have in large part to thank modern science and the application of pesticides.
Pesticides were developed to rid us of pests that plague our environment and lower the quality of
life. Included in the pesticide category are insecticides, fungicides, herbicides, rodenticides,
germacides, and a whole host of other "-cides." However, there is growing concern on the part
of consumers and scientists that the very thing that has been of such great benefit may in itself
be
causing harm in subtle ways by a select few of the pesticide chemicals. The Food Quality
Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA) signed into law August 3, 1996 is an attempt to address some of
these complex issues. FQPA (P.L. 140-170) amends both the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and
Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) to provide a
comprehensive and protective regulatory scheme for pesticides.
KEY TOPICS OF FQPA
- Health Based Safety Standard for Pesticide Residues in Food
- Special Provisions for Infants and Children
- Limitations on Benefits Considerations
- Tolerance Reevaluation
- Endocrine Disruptors
- Enforcement
- Right to Know
- Pesticide Registration
- Minor Use Pesticides
- Anti-Microbial Pesticides
|
Although the issues at stake have been hotly debated for many years, the law virtually zoomed
through
Congress and was signed into law with little or no floor debate. Many agricultural associations
supported the bill including the National Food Processors Association (NFPA) and the American
Crop Protection Association (ACPA). Rick Jarman of NFPA declared the removal of the
Delaney
paradox (glossary) and the movement toward a single standard based on sound science to be the
key component of FQPA. However, there remains a great deal of uncertainty in pesticide
manufacturing and use. Under provisions of the new law, the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) will also now have increased enforcement authority to apply civil penalties. Over the
next
ten years residue limits will be reviewed for each pesticide in use by the EPA. Ann
Lindsey of EPA says this will be a long process and the agency is now just in the committee
stage.
Presently, more than 25,000 pesticide products are on the market and the EPA has approved 350
for food use. Some of the pesticides most likely to top the new list can be found in the March
30,
1994 Federal Register: "Updated List of Pesticides and Uses Potentially Affected by the
Delaney Clause of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act." residue limits Federal Register
MONITORING
FDA's job of monitoring the food supply will continue under the new law as part of its
responsibility to protect consumers. USDA will continue to monitor meat, poultry and egg
products. FDA tests about 11,000 domestic and imported food items each year for pesticide
residues. Sampling is done early in the food production process to prevent distribution of illegal
residues. Emphasis is given to food commodities of major dietary importance. Monitoring
efforts show that pesticides seldom appear in food at unsafe levels. Of the 10,814 samples
tested
in FDA's 1994 general surveillance program it found that 99% had no illegal residues and no
residues were detected in 83%.
The FDA's total diet study has also found that the residue levels are consistently below the safe
limits of exposure recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). Maximum residue
limits (MRLs) for pesticides are established by the WHO Codex Committee on Pesticide
Residues. The FQPA requires EPA to publish a notice for public comment whenever the agency
proposes a tolerance that differs from an established Codex MRL.
RISK DEBATE
The major debate in settling residue limits will center on the risk of chronic exposure to
extremely
low doses of pesticides over time. As many opponents to the Delaney Clause have maintained
for years, most pesticides are ingested in such minuscule quantities (parts per million or trillion)
that the body can easily metabolize them or excrete them unchanged without their doing any
damage. However, the 1993 report by the National Academy of Sciences "Pesticides in the
Diets
of Infants and Children" considers that children may be especially sensitive to pesticide
chemicals.
FQPA law requires an explicit determination that tolerances are safe for children up to ten-fold
if
necessary. This stipulation is in addition to the already conservative tolerances set for raw
agricultural commodities in 40CFR S180. Additionally, the new pesticide residue standard will
be
the same for raw and processed foods.
Another area of concern in the risk debate is endocrine disruptors. Very little is known about the
mechanisms of endocrine disruption or possible synergistic effects. However, FQPA provides
new authority to require that chemical manufacturers provide data on their products of potential
adverse effects on the endocrine system.
The risk debate will most certainly complicate tying pesticides to a single standard based on
sound
science. However, if sound science, the hoped-for goal of FQPA, can indeed triumph over
political verbiage and the vested interests of government and industry, we will all be winners.
| How the Body Handles
Pesticides | |
| Pesticides that are ingested enter the body
by absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. |
 |
Gas or vapor forms are
excreted through the lungs. |
| Most water soluble chemicals go
directly from the small itestine to the liver via the hepatic portal vein and are metabolized. Any
remaining chemical enters the blood stream to be circulated. |
The kidneys and lungs are major organs
for excretion of chemicals from the blood stream and metabolic waste is eliminated from the
blood via urine. |
| Fat soluble chemicals bypass the
liver by going into the lymphatic system, which empties into the blood stream. |
All foreign chemicals ingested
eventually exit from the body, either in the same form or after being metabolized to other
compounds. |
Return To Table of Contents
Selected Bibliography
- Fenner-Crisp-PA. Pesticides - The NAS Report: How can the Recommendations be
Implemented? Environ Health Perspect. 1995 Sep; 103(Suppl 6):159-62.
- Jarman, Rick. Personal Interview. Washington, DC: National Food Processors Assn; 1996
Oct 3.
- Kacew, S.; Akhtar, M.H.; Khan, S.U. Bioavailability of Bound Pesticide Residues and
Potential Toxicologic Consequences - An Update. Prox Soc Exp Biol Med. 1996;
211(1):62-68 (Ref: 73).
- Lindsey, Ann. Personal Interview. Washington, DC: EPA: Office of Prevention, Pesticides
& Toxic Substances; 1996 Sep 24.
- McCarthy, John. Personal Interview. Washington, DC: American Crop Protection Assoc;
1996 Oct 4.
- Ottoboni, M. Alice. The Dose Makes the Poison: A Plain-Language Guide to Toxicology.
Berkeley, CA: Vincente Books; 1984.
- Pennington, J.A.; Capat, S.G.; Parfitt, C.H.; Edwards, C.W. History of the Food and Drug
Administration's Total Diet Study (Part II), 1987-1993. J OAC Int. 1996 Jan;
79(1):163-70.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The Food Quality Protection Act of 1996.
Washington, DC: US EPA; 1996 Aug.
Return To Table of Contents
Glossary of Terms
- CARBAMATES
- Insecticides which owe their activity to the carbamate moiety in the molecule. Examples
include:
Aldicarb, Carbaryl, Methomyl.
- DELANEY CLAUSE
- Requires that chemicals used as food additives be considered as human carcinogens if
they
produce cancer in the animal species, at any level of exposure.
- FUNGICIDES
- Chemicals that kill or inhibit the growth of fungi in agricultural applications. Examples
include: Benomyl, Captan, Hexachlorobenzene and Maneb.
- HERBICIDES
- Pesticides used to kill unwanted vegetation, especially various types of weeds, grasses and
wood plants. Examples include: Amitrole, Dicamba, Paraquat and Trifluralin.
- ORGANOPHOSPHATES
- A class of insecticides composed of organic radical bound to a phosphorus containing
radical. Examples include: Dichlorvos, Trichlorfon, Tetrachlorvinphos and Paraoxon.
- PEST
- Any insect, rodent, nematode, fungus, weed or any other form of terrestrial or aquatic
plant
or animal life or virus, bacteria, or other micro-organism which the administrator declares to be
a
pest under section 25(c)(1) of Pub. L. 94-140, Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide
Act. 40 CFR S455.10
- PESTICIDE
- Any substance or mixture of substances intended for preventing, destroying, repelling, or
mitigating any pest. 40 CFR S455.10
- PESTICIDE RESIDUES
- Pesticides or their breakdown products remaining in the environment following their
normal
use or accidental contamination.
- RODENTICIDES
- Substance used to destroy or inhibit the action of rats, mice, or other rodents. Examples
include: Aminopterin and Warfarin.
Return To Table of Contents
Toxic Notes
The Food Marketing Institute has a publication available on "Pesticides In the Food Supply"
which covers the facts behind key issues affecting the supermarket industry. Facts on pesticides
are presented in a neutral manner along with the positions of different parties debating the
issues.
The eight page backgrounder may be obtained by calling (202) 452-8444.
The EPA Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances has a complete overview
available on "The Food Quality Protection Act of 1996". To obtain a copy at no charge contact
the docket office between the hours of 8 AM and 4:30 PM at (703) 305-5805.
Return To Table of Contents
Pesticides & Children
MTI is offering the
most up-to-date bibliography available on Pesticides and Children. The
reviewed publication contains over two hundred citations with abstracts covering
all areas of this hotly debated issue. Citations are gleaned from a wide variety
of sources including on-line, CD-Rom, manual indexes and many hard-to-find non-indexed
materials. Our comprehensive research ensures complete non-biased coverage of
the medical and scientific literature.
© 1996 Medical & Toxicological Information, Inc.
Copyright © 1996-2010 Medical &
Toxicological Information (MTI) A Division of NICOM, Inc. All rights
reserved
703 684-4636 703 MTI-INFO
Home
About MTI
Contact MTI
News/Pub
Services